IWM (Russell 2000 small caps) daily:

FXE (The Euro) daily:

DBA (Agriculture commodities) daily:

FXI (Chinese stocks) daily:

QQQQ (Nasdaq 100) daily:
Disclosure: I am short EUR and own QQQQ puts.
Welcome to Stock Geometry! This casual music and financial blog typically involves posts of music videos and candlestick stock charts looking at intermediate term trends. Think MTV meets CNBC. My positions fluctuate, but I’ll always disclose positions in posted stocks. You are responsible for your investments! – Dr. pythagoruz




Disclosure: I am short EUR and own QQQQ puts.
Yeah, the head and shoulders reversal in DBC technically hasn't completed as it hasn't closed above $22.89, but I'm gonna go ahead and call this. If you look at pretty much any individual commodity besides natural gas (UNG) you'll see a clear uptrend over the past three to six months. Oil, agriculture, gold, etc, are making higher highs on increasing volume. The H&S pattern on DBC targets about $28, but this could take some time to play out. Natural gas is the one area where prices haven't been uptrending but after today's surge it looks to me like UNG has formed a double bottom. Time will tell but I feel comfortable in saying that a new bull market in commodities has begun.
Its always important to be aware of the longer term picture and what I see in the two year weekly chart is a one and a half year old bear market. It seems to fit well with an Elliot wave pattern where we've completed the first two of three downwards cycles. That is, we have moved beyond denial (wave 1), more recently acceptance (wave 3) and now we await the final downwards cycle (the fifth wave) of panic. A big unknown is how far we will rally in wave 4. I would guess that the 200 dma could be reached but its moving lower each day and I'd place an upper limit at $650 on the Russell 2000. A lower target is very tough in such extremes but I'd guesstimate somewhere near $250.
It represents Lanworthʼs best estimates of year-end production based on planted acreage, harvested acreage, and modeled crop yields at district and sub-district levels. In its 12 January 2009 Crop Production 2008 Summary report, USDA revised both its corn and soybean production estimates upward by approximately 1%. In doing so, USDA brought its production estimates for both commodities into close agreement with those issued in Lanworth's 21 November 2008 report and, indeed, those issued earlier in the year (Figure 1). To effect its revisions, USDA adjusted acreage and/or yield estimates for most producing states. Because Lanworth accepts USDA acreage estimates for states not mapped by satellite and USDA yield estimates for states not modeled, USDAʼs adjustments do affect Lanworthʼs production estimates, albeit slightly. In what follows we present updated corn and soybean production estimates incorporating USDA revisions in unmapped and unmodeled states. Here Lanworth updates its 2008 US corn production estimate to 12,216 million bushels, a negligible upward revision of roughly 3 million bushels. Lanworthʼs current estimate stands only slightly higher (115 million bushels vs 74,641 thousand).


How would you like to know the earnings numbers for some stock before the market release? Sure, it would be illegal, requiring inside information, but you could definitely make a lot of money if the market was making a poor prediction. I guess that's why analysts get paid so well; they estimate corporate earnings which can be very profitable for their clients if they don't screw it up (as we've noticed they often do). But what if you could really and legally know the numbers?








Until late February, DBA was in a very strong uptrend. As you may have noticed on TV or at the grocery store, agriculture prices have gone up substantially in the past year. The exchange traded fund DBA represents a composite of Sugar, Wheat, Corn and Soy Beans so it has captured much of the recent move up in edible commodities. However, in late February DBA made a new high and has been consolidating ever since, just look at the descending triangle above.
